3/18/2007
Biebuyck just wants to have fun
The artist, whose show “PEARaphernalia” is on
exhibit at the Jewish Community Center of Reading,
pays homage to the work of 20th-century artists, not
to mention a certain sensual fruit. It’s a blast.
By Ron Schira
Berks County, PA - You’ve got to just love it when somebody takes a good idea and runs with it. That’s the way I feel looking at Susan Biebuyck’s “PEARaphernalia” exhibit, on view at the Jewish Community Center of Reading through March 31. Aside from the fact that the JCC has of late been kicking out one show after another, this exhibit is probably one of the most lyrical and humorous displays I have seen in a long while.
Biebuyck is a skilled realist painter with 15 years of professional graphic design behind her and a degree from Kutztown University. Yet she left all of that in the past tense to follow the fine arts, which she has loved since childhood. So when the GoggleWorks Center for the Arts opened two years ago, she took up shop on the second floor and is now selling her work. She has not once regretted her decision to forego the commercial end of somebody else’s idea.
The idea of this show pertains to the adaptation of a simple shape, namely a pear fruit, and how it corresponds to the various movements of modern art. To add, the paintings in the exhibit often showcase her representational skills but also display her more-than-adequate knowledge and comprehension of art within the last century. The paintings plainly appropriate the styles of a few great artists and very cleverly mimic their appearance to a fault.
“Before,” she said, “I had painted a couple of very tasteful nudes, but some people thought they were lewd and complained about them. So I chose the pear as my subject matter because it is only a fruit and somewhat innocuous. It is responsive and pliant and not stuck in negativity or political commentary.
“It has a pleasant, round, even sensual shape and can mold itself to anything I ask of it, including my adaptation and homage to my heroes of contemporary art. In this way I am responding to art of the 20th century.”
Obvious impersonations of style by Jasper Johns, Joan Miro, Piet Mondrian, Jackson Pollack, Henri Matisse, Andy Warhol, Keith Haring and others hang on the walls in a makeshift procession of cultural personae. She adroitly copies the mannerisms and techniques of Surrealism, Art-Deco, Abstract Expression, Pop, etc., with perfect aplomb.
I had to chuckle at a few of these. I especially fancied the Magritte look-alike with the woman as artist and a pear instead of the famous apple obscuring her head. The Haring, Miro and Mondrian pieces were quite enjoyable as well.
“For the painting I did on Klimt,” she said, “I taught myself how to use gold leaf.”
Appropriation, as such, was popular in the 1980s during the New York East Village craze with artists David Wojnarowicz, who stole images from the media and Mike Bidlo, especially, who directly copied artworks by Picasso and Duchamp in a way that skirted the fringes of plagiarism.
Serious artists, they felt that picking and revising from the culture re-contextualized the content of their work and added new meaning to the term originality within an oversaturated, information-based society. To simplify, they recycled a familiar image outside of its field of recognition to mean something new.
Biebuyck’s images are not per se copies since she has not taken from a particular artwork and her paintings only mimic the stylistic appearance. They contain very little subtext. They are a tip-of-the-hat to her artistic inspirations and predecessors more so than any kind of political repartee or art-world rhetoric while merely using the pear fruit as a compositional device. These humorous, almost campy artworks have a great deal to do with the pure enjoyment of art before the theories and queries messed it up.
But of course, that is exactly what she wanted: to bypass all that stuff and just have fun.